GEORGE LOUIS ROLDAN, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Ellyn Feldman v. Kritch, 824 So. 2d 274 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)
  …he statutory privilege protecting the confidentiality of all oral and written communications, other than the executed settlement agreement, should not apply. See § 44.102(3), Fla. Stat. (2000); DR Lakes, Inc. v. Brandsmart U.S.A. of West Palm Beach, 819 So. 2d 971 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). In DR Lakes, this court explained that the reason for confidentiality as to statements made during mediation where a settlement agreement is not reached was obvious. See id. at 974. “Mediation could not take place if litigants…
• Brandsmart U.S.A. OF W. Palm Beach, Inc. v. DR Lakes, Inc., 901 So. 2d 1004 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)
  …e settlement privilege contained in section 44.102(3), Florida Statutes (2001), did not apply to a case where the issue was whether there had been a mutual mistake in a settlement agreement. See DR Lakes, Inc. v. Brandsmart U.S.A. ofWest Palm Beach, 819 So. 2d 971 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). We remanded the case for trial on the issue of mutual mistake. We observed that while it might “be difficult for seller to prove that this mistake was mutual, given the position of the buyer, seller should still have the opportu…
• Enter. Leasing Co. v. Demartino, 15 So. 3d 711 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)
  …nd then, due to either a scrivener’s error or inadvertence, express something different in the written instrument.” Providence Square Ass’n v. Biancardi, 507 So. 2d 1366, 1372 (Fla.1987); see also DR Lakes Inc. v. Brandsmart U.S.A. of W. Palm Beach, 819 So. 2d 971, 974 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (“When an instrument is drawn and executed which is intended to carry into execution an agreement but which by mistake of the draftsman violates or does not fulfill that intention, equity will reform the instrument so as to…

Authorities Cited

• Gissendanner v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 1979)
• Robinson v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 1979)
• Maddox v. State, 760 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 2000)