ROBERT B. HAUSS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ROBERT B. HAUSS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
819 So. 2d 987
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Robert Hauss, (the Appellant), appeals his sentence imposed as a result of his conviction and adjudication of guilt for multiple counts of D.U.I. The Appellant argues that the written order does not conform to the oral pronouncement of sentence.
The State has conceded error in this case. Therefore, we affirm the Appellant’s conviction, but remand to the trial court to enter a written order conforming to the trial judge’s oral pronouncement at sentencing. See Cheshire v. State, 568 So. 2d 908, 913 (Fla.1990).
AFFIRMED.
GUNTHER, STONE and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gardner v. State, 30 So. 3d 629 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)…tute to the ten-year minimum term. The original sentence, which included a downward departure rather than the minimum mandatory term, was an erroneous sentence. See State v. Calzada-Padrón, 708 So. 2d 287 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); see also Beard v. State, 819 So. 2d 987 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (affirming imposition of the minimum mandatory portion of a life sentence, as automatic, upon resentencing after remand of direct appeal); Van Burén v. State, 500 So. 2d 732 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987) (holding that efforts to correct unla…
Authorities Cited
- Cheshire v. State, 568 So. 2d 908 (Fla. 1990)