PINELLAS SUNCOAST TRANSIT AUTHORITY, PETITIONER,
v.
SUSAN INDISH-MILITELLO, RESPONDENT
PINELLAS SUNCOAST TRANSIT AUTHORITY, PETITIONER,
SUSAN INDISH-MILITELLO, RESPONDENT
819 So. 2d 1011
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority timely petitions this court to review an order which denied its motion to dismiss the respondent’s claim against the Authority now pending before the Florida Commission on Human Relations. Petitioner, however, fails to demonstrate that “review of the final agency decision would not provide an adequate remedy,” the showing necessary to obtain interlocutory review pursuant to section 120.68(1), Florida Statutes. See Johnson v. Henningson, 370 So. 2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). Accordingly, the petition is denied.
PETITION DENIED.
ALLEN, C.J., BARFIELD and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Barry v. State, 920 So. 2d 166 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)…court’s order without comment except to the extent that it purports to grant the appellant a belated appeal from his revocation of probation. The trial court lacked jurisdiction to grant a belated appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c); Lane v. State, 819 So. 2d 1011, 1012 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). We therefore vacate that part of the order granting a belated appeal without prejudice to the appellant’s right to seek a belated appeal in this Court pursuant to [*167] Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c). AFFI…
Authorities Cited
- Johnson v. Henningson, 370 So. 2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979)