JOEL LEE HURST, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Ondrejack v. Ondrejack, 839 So. 2d 867 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)
  …arriage qualifies as “long term,” whieh carries a rebuttable presumption of entitlement to permanent alimony. See Hill v. Hooten, 776 So. 2d 1004 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)(recognizing that a seventeen year marriage qualified as long term); Cerra v. Cerra, 820 So. 2d 398, 401 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). The final judgment is also devoid of any finding of fact as to the standard of living established by the parties during the marriage. The trial court’s failure to make any findings of fact regarding the standard of living…
• Motie v. Anirude Motie, 132 So. 3d 1210 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014)
  …oth types of alimony remain subject to modification upon a substantial change in circumstances. § 61.08(7), (8), Fla. Stat. There is a rebuttable presumption that permanent periodic alimony is appropriate after a long-term marriage. Cerra v. Cerra, 820 So. 2d 398, 401 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (citing Hill v. Hooten, 776 So. 2d 1004, 1007 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)). Neither age nor a spouse’s ability to earn some income will alone rebut the presumption. Id. There is also a rebuttable presumption that a marriage lasting…
• Greene v. Greene, 895 So. 2d 503 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)
  …1996). . Blanchard v. Blanchard, 793 So. 2d 989 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Glazner v. Glazner, 693 So. 2d 650 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). . Noe v. Noe, 431 So. 2d 657 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Harts v. Harts, 383 So. 2d 952 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). . See Cerra v. Cerra, 820 So. 2d 398 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Vitalis v. Vitalis, 799 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Young v. Young, 677 So. 2d 1301 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). . For example, in denying an award of permanent periodic alimony, the trial court found "no medical evidence of anyth…

Authorities Cited

• Black v. State, 819 So. 2d 208 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)