WILLIAM STEWART STEELE, PETITIONER,
v.
MICHAEL W. MOORE, ETC., RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Certiorari Relief cases and more on FLexlaw
William Stewart Steele petitions this court for certiorari relief. Steele alleges that the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law when it dismissed his petition for mandamus without providing him an opportunity to file a reply to the Department of Correction’s response. Because the issue is now moot, we dismiss the petition.
It would serve no useful purpose to recite the long procedural history of this matter. Suffice it to say that the circuit court has now provided Steele an opportunity to file his reply. That renders Steele’s petition to this court moot. However, the delay in resolving Steele’s underlying mandamus proceeding has been largely attributable to procedural mistakes over which Steele had no control. Accordingly, although we dismiss this petition as moot, we believe the trial court should provide Steele an expeditious ruling on his petition for writ of mandamus.
PETITION DISMISSED.
PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Smith v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 823 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)…is disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. § 44S.101(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2001). Whether an employee left employment voluntarily and whether the leaving was without good cause are questions of fact. Brown v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 820 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). In some circumstances, an employee’s acceptance of a severance package on leaving employment does not bar unemployment compensation. See LeCroy v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 654 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). However, th…
-
Parker v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 41 So. 3d 1090 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)…good cause. As a result of this determination, Parker was denied unemployment benefits. We affirm. Whether an employee left employment voluntarily and whether he did so without good cause are questions of fact. Brown v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 820 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). An appeal referee’s factual determinations are ordinarily presumed to be correct. Smith v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 823 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). Thus, if there is substantial competent evidence in the record to suppor…
-
Fillmore v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n & La Petite Acad. Inc., 873 So. 2d 1256 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)…at appellant was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. We affirm. The appeals referee determined that appellant left her employment voluntarily without good cause attributable to the employer. See Brown v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 820 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)(stating that whether an employee left employment voluntarily and whether the leaving was without good cause are questions of fact). The issue on appeal is whether the referee’s findings of fact are supported by competent, substan…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence