JAMES KING, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 2002-05-30
No. SC01-1883
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
820 So. 2d 941 Florida Supreme Court (2002) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted for review the decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal in King v. State, 790 So. 2d 477 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), which certified conflict with Winter v. State, 781 So. 2d 1111 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), and certified the following question for review:

DOES THE OFFICE OF THE STATEWIDE PROSECUTOR HAVE JURISDICTION TO PROSECUTE A BURGLARY IN THE COUNTY IN WHICH IT WAS COMMITTED IF IT IS ALLEGED THAT THE BURGLARY WAS A PART OF A BUSINESS ENTERPRISE ENGAGED IN MUL-TI-CIRCUIT CRIMES?

Upon further consideration, we find that review was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this .review proceeding is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Scott v. State, 102 So. 3d 676 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012)
    …nter v. State, 781 So. 2d 1111 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), disapproved on other grounds, Carbajal v. State, 75 So. 3d 258, 260 (Fla.2011). The supreme court ultimately dismissed review of King as improvidently granted (by unpublished order). King v. State, 820 So. 2d 941 (Fla.2002). . We note that if the facts supporting OSP's authority are disputed, a pretrial evidentiary hearing may be required. Although the Flori [*679] da Rules of Criminal Procedure do not expressly provide for evidentiary hearings on motions t…
  • Joseph v. Cal Henderson, 834 So. 2d 373 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
    …4th DCA 2000) (holding that Broward County Jail’s practice of charging a one-time uniform fee of $10 and a daily subsistence fee of $2 was proper under section 951.033 and did not violate an inmate’s procedural due process rights), review dismissed, 820 So. 2d 941 (Fla.2002). Joseph next argues that the sheriffs application of the statute to inmates returning to the jail from state prison contravenes the legislative intent. He asserts that no fees should be assessed against state prisoners returning to the j…
  • Dominguez v. State, 937 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)
    …PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See King v. State, 790 So. 2d 477 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), review granted, 816 So. 2d 127 (Fla.), and review dismissed as improvidently granted, 820 So. 2d 941 (Fla.), and cert. denied, 537 U.S. 961, 123 S.Ct. 394, 154 L.Ed.2d 314 (2002). MONACO, TORPY and LAWSON, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw