EDITH E. RODRIGUEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 2002-07-10
No. 3D01-2560
Before COPE, GREEN, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
820 So. 2d 1051 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Patterson v. FPL Group, Inc., 770 So. 2d 298 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (stating that if “the ruling of the appeals referee was supported by competent substantial evidence, the Unemployment Appeals Commission was not free'to reweigh the evidence.”).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Shuler v. State, 7 So. 3d 648 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)
    …We affirm the revocation of Defendant’s probation and the sentence imposed. We remand, however, for entry of a written revocation order listing the grounds for the violation. See Bell v. State, 851 So. 2d 253 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Rodriguez v. State, 820 So. 2d 1051 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Cifuentes v. State, 717 So. 2d 136 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). Affirmed and remanded with instructions.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw