EDWARD Q. BRUTON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
EDWARD Q. BRUTON, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
820 So. 2d 1083
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Melbourne v. State, 679 So. 2d 759, 764 (Fla.1996); Davis v. State, 691 So. 2d 1180, 1182 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Quinones v. Maybell Pineiros Quinones, 870 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)…ctly follow the dictates of Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.071(d)(1), which states: “A county or circuit court judge may, if all the parties consent, allow testimony to be taken through communication equipment.” See also Russell v. State, 820 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment of dissolution as to the amount of the alimony award and as to the imputation of income to the Husband. Upon remand, if the court once again imputes income to the Husband, it must make…
Authorities Cited
- Jeanie H. Melbourne v. State, 679 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 1996)
- Davis v. State, 691 So. 2d 1180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)