JAMES ODUM, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2002-07-09
No. 1D01-2330
BOOTH, WOLF and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
821 So. 2d 377 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2002)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that while the trial court correctly noted the motion lacked record support, the record suggests the appellant may be entitled to additional jail credit, requiring further review.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant was sentenced to 40 months imprisonment for violating community service and received 98 days of jail credit. Appellant sought additional jai…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was sentenced to 40 months imprisonment for violation of community service, with 98 days of jail credit. Appellant appeals the denial of his motion to correct sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(b)(2),1 seeking additional jail credit. The trial court correctly noted that Appellant’s motion fails to identify record support for his alleged entitlement to additional jail credit. However, since the record suggests Appellant may be entitled to additional jail credit, we remand for review of the necessary records.

We therefore must reverse and remand to allow the trial court to further examine the court file and jail records, see Thompson v. State, 772 So. 2d 575 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Nelson v. State, 760 So. 2d 240 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), and to assess the amount of jail credit, if any, to which Appellant is entitled.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

BOOTH, WOLF and LEWIS, JJ., concur. . Appellant filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s denial of a motion to dismiss, claiming the modification of probation was invalid.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw