PEACE CREEK DRAINAGE DISTRICT, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
C. V. TURNER, DEFENDANT IN ERROR

Fla. | 1929-04-04
Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
97 Fla. 486 Florida Supreme Court (1929) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The transcript of the record discloses no final judgment and therefore the writ of error is withorit foundation and should be dismissed.

The bill of exceptions is without force and effect as it appears to have been made up and presented after the expiration of the time allowed in an order made during the term of the court at which motion for new trial was made, and denied. It*does not appear to have been made up in pursuance of a final judgment.

The order of the court made after adjournment of the term extending the time in which to make up and present bill of exceptions was without authority of law.

The writ of error is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Johnson v. Johnson, 454 So. 2d 797 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)
    …fall within the prohibition of Conner, supra. Finally, we affirm the partial attorney fee award to the wife because the record does not contain a copy of the trial court’s final order on fees and costs, see Peace Creek Drainage District v. Turner, 97 Fla. 486, 121 So. 469 (1929), or a transcript of the attorney’s fees hearing. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla.1979); Starks v. Starks, 423 So. 2d 452 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). [*800] In sum, we reverse the final judgment of diss…
  • Cocoa-Rockledge Drainage Dist. v. Agnew, 111 Fla. 575 (Fla. 1934)
    …Terrell, J. A motion to strike the bill of exceptions in this cause was granted. It was predicated on Myrick v. Merritt, 21 Fla. 799, and Peace Creek Drainage District v. Turner, 97 Fla. 486, 121 So. 469. In these cases we held that a bill of exceptions is without effect, when it was made up and pres'ented after expiration of time allowed in order made during term of court at which motion for new 'trial was made and denied, since order…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw