GEORGE LIND, APPELLANT,
v.
THE CITY OF MIAMI, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2002-06-12
No. 3D01-2195
Before LEVY, GERSTEN, and GREEN, JJ.
821 So. 2d 1112 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Wong v. Crown Equipment Corp., 676 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Adkins v. Economy Engineering Co., 495 So. 2d 247 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Schriefer v. Schriefer, 831 So. 2d 1284 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)
    …S(l)(j). Although the trial court found a lack of candor on the part of the wife, it did not base its distribution scheme on this factor, as it is not one of the justifications for an unequal distribution in section 61.075(1). See also Ruiz v. Ruiz, 821 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). . § 61.075(1), Fla. Stat. (1999). See Ingle v. Ingle, 640 So. 2d 223, 224 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Mahaffey v. Mahaffey, 401 So. 2d 1372 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). . Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980)…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw