FRANKIE NETTLES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
FRANKIE NETTLES, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
821 So. 2d 1233
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Based on this court’s May 3, 2002 Opinion and June 17, 2002 Order and the July 3, 2002 Response of Frankie Nettles, we prohibit Nettles from filing any additional pro se filings or pleadings relating to his 1993-1994 conviction and sentence. See Nettles v. State, 645 So. 2d 484 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
Any further filings or pleadings relating to the above case must be reviewed and signed by an attorney, licensed to practice law in this state. The Clerk of the Court of the Fifth District Court of Appeal is directed not to accept any further pro se filings or pleadings from matters related to lower court Case Number CR 93-3603.
COBB, SHARP, W. and ORFINGER, R.B., JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Allstate Indem. Co. v. Ruiz, 899 So. 2d 1121 (Fla. 2005)…y and directly conflicts with a number of cases from other district courts with regard to issues concerning application of work product privilege to shield documents from discovery in the insurance bad faith context. See Vesta Fire Ins. v. Figueroa, 821 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Fla. Farm Bureau Gen. Ins. Co. v. Copertino, 810 So. 2d 1076 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., v. Ballasso, 789 So. 2d 519 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); McRae’s, Inc. v. Moreland, 765 So. 2d 196 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Prudential…1 / 2
-
Nasir M. Ashemimry v. Sheik Ahmed Abdul Rahman Saleh BA Nafa, 847 So. 2d 603 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)…a Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(3) does allow discovery of fact work product where the requesting party can show need and the inability to obtain the substantial equivalent by other means without undue hardship. Vesta Fire Ins. Corp. v. Figueroa, 821 So. 2d 1233, 1234 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). The showing of need and undue hardship necessary to overcome the work product immunity is more than a bare assertion and must include specific explanations and reasons. The unsworn allegations of counsel are insufficient.…
-
Kmart Corp. v. Sundmacher, 997 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)…’s attorney, finding that the transcript was the sole transcript of the proceedings which Colonial Penn needed to prepare its defense and Colonial Penn could not obtain the transcripts by any other means). In Vesta Fire Insurance Corp. v. Figueroa, 821 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002), the insured filed a bad faith claim against her insurance company for failing to pay her claim. In an effort to prove her claim, Figueroa sought production of various documents including Vesta’s entire claim file. The case turne…