MATTHEW CHRISTOPHER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2002-08-02
No. 2D00-5296
SALCINES and KELLY, JJ., Concur.
821 So. 2d 1275 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2002) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case


Opinion of the Court
NORTHCUTT, Judge.

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

Matthew Christopher challenges his conviction and sentence for burglary of a dwelling. We affirm the conviction without comment. We agree with Christopher’s assertion that he should not have been sentenced under the Prison Releasee Reoffender Punishment Act (PRRPA), section 775.082(9)(a)(l)(q), Florida Statutes (2000). The information filed against Christopher charged that he burglarized a dwelling. It did not specify that the dwelling was occupied, nor did the jury make a factual determination that the dwelling was occupied when Christopher committed his offense. Under these circumstances, his offense did not qualify for PRRPA sentencing. Weems v. State, 795 So. 2d 122, 125 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). See also Dudley v. State, 802 So. 2d 461, 462 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Parker v. State, 799 So. 2d 282, 283 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded for resentencing.

SALCINES and KELLY, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Howard v. State, 835 So. 2d 1173 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)
    …mary denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence. We affirm without prejudice to any right Howard might have to challenge the Prison Releasee Reoffender Punishment Act sentence imposed on him for attempted burglary. See Christopher v. State, 821 So. 2d 1275 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). Affirmed. NORTHCUTT, SALCINES, and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw