MARY BETH JOEB, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2002-07-26
No. 2D02-2088
WHATLEY and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur.
822 So. 2d 554 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2002) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Topics
Face Of The Record Facially Sufficient Motion Jail Credit Evidentiary Hearing

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Face Of The Record cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court
SALCINES, Judge.

[*555] SALCINES, Judge.

Mary Beth Joeb challenges the order of the trial court denying her motion for jail credit filed pursuant to Florida Rule-of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Joeb did not allege that any error in jail credit is reviewable from the face of the record, and she therefore did not present a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) jail credit claim. See Searight v. State, 795 So. 2d 988 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). We affirm the order of the trial court on this basis. The trial court, however, addressed the claim on its merits. Ip denying the claim, the trial court failed to attach the sheriffs jail log, and the attachments to the trial court’s order do not conclusively refute Joeb’s claim.

Our affirmance is without prejudice to any right Joeb might have to file a facially sufficient motion for jail credit pursuant to rule 3.800(a) or a timely, facially sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Searight, 795 So. 2d 988. If Joeb files a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) motion and the trial court again denies the claim, it shall attach those portions of the record that conclusively refute the claim. See Whitt v. State, 807 So. 2d 788 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). Should Joeb file a facially sufficient rule 3.850 motion, the trial court shall either attach those portions of the record that conclusively refute the claim or conduct an evidentiary hearing.

Affirmed.

WHATLEY and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Williams v. State, 848 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
    …son and/or jail credit and, if jail credit, how much time he was entitled to. Furthermore, he failed to allege that any jail credit claim is reviewable from the face of the record, and the claim is therefore facially insufficient. See Joeb v. State, 822 So. 2d 554 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). Our affirmance is without prejudice to any right Mr. Williams has to file a facially sufficient motion for prison and/or jail credit pursuant to rule 3.800(a). Affirmed without prejudice. WHATLEY and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw