F. W. WOOLWORTH COMPANY, A CORPORATION, AND CHARLES H. JOHNSON, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
MARY N. MCCLOUD, A FREE DEALER, DEFENDANT IN ERROR

Fla. | 1929-04-16
Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Brown and Buford, J. J., and Johnson, Circuit Judge, concur., Strum, J., disqualified.
97 Fla. 590 Florida Supreme Court (1929)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Supreme Court reviewed a judgment against two defendants for $17,500. The court agreed the damages were excessive and offered the plaintiff a choice: either remit $5,000 from the judgment or face a new trial.


Holding

The court found that while there was disagreement on whether the liability was joint, all justices agreed that the damages awarded were excessive. The judgment was affirmed if the plaintiff agreed to a reduced amount, otherwise, it was reversed for a new trial.


Key Quotes

“Upon consideration of the record Mr. Chief Justice Terrell, Mr. Justice Whitfield [*591] and Mr. Justice Buford are of the opinion that on the particular facts shown the liability is joint, while Mr. Justice Ellis, Mr. Justice Brown and Circuit Judge Johnson, sitting in lieu of Mr. Justice Strum, disqualified, are of the opinion that the liability is not joint.”

This quote highlights the divided opinion among the justices regarding the nature of the defendants' liability.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

A judgment was rendered against the defendants, F. W. Woolworth Company and Charles H. Johnson, as joint tortfeasors, for $17,500.00 in damages. The c…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam

Per Curiam

A judgment was rendered herein against the defendants below, plaintiffs in error here, for $17,500.00 damages, as joint tore feasors. Upon consideration of the record Mr. Chief Justice Terrell, Mr. Justice Whitfield and Mr. Justice Buford are of the opinion that on the particular facts shown the liability is joint, while Mr. Justice Ellis, Mr. Justice Brown and Circuit Judge Johnson, sitting in lieu of Mr. Justice Strum, disqualified, are of the opinion that the liability is not joint. All agree that the damages awarded are excessive. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged that if the plaintiff below shall remit $5,000.00 the judgment shall stand affirmed for $12,500.00, otherwise the judgment will stand reversed for a new trial. It is so ordered.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Brown and Buford, J. J., and Johnson, Circuit Judge, concur. Strum, J., disqualified.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw