CHADRICK SHOCKLEY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CHADRICK SHOCKLEY, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
823 So. 2d 236
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This appeal from the trial court’s denial of a rule 3.800 motion is dismissed as untimely because the notice of appeal was certified as filed more than 30 days after the order denying the motion, and in response to our order to show cause the appellant has acknowledged that the notice was untimely. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(b), 9.420(a)(1), (e) (2002).
The appellant’s request for a belated appeal is denied.
DISMISSED.
BOOTH, WOLF, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fla. Elections Comm'n v. Fla. Educ. Association-Quality Pub. Educ. Corp., Inc., 909 So. 2d 383 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)…eding shall become a part of the record on appeal from a final order entered in the context of the administrative proceeding), and, therefore, it too cannot truly be characterized as non-final. Cf. Fla. Fish & Wildlife Conservation Comm’n v. McGill, 823 So. 2d 236, 237-38 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (holding that a party aggrieved by a concededly non-final order entered by an administrative law judge in an administrative proceeding could seek review of the order by cross-appeal in the appeal from the final order ente…