TIMOTHY TAYLOR, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from the denial of his motion for postconviction relief. Based upon the trial court’s thorough and well-reasoned order, we affirm. See Jacobs v. State, 800 So. 2d 322, 323 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (holding that “[Djefense counsel is not ineffective for failing to call witnesses who allegedly would have provided exculpating testimony, where there was ample evidence contradicting the testimony the witness would have given. Absent extraordinary circumstances, failure of counsel to call a witness is not a ground for collateral attack.”) (citations omitted).
AFFIRMED.
JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ., concur.
COPE, J.
(dissenting in part).
I would reverse the order denying relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 and remand for an evidentiary hearing on points two and five. I agree with the majority on affirmance on the remaining issues.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
P.I.W. v. State, 827 So. 2d 383 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)…PER CURIAM. We affirm the adjudication of delinquency on authority of C.C. v. State, 823 So. 2d 263 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). We note, however, that the duration of the probation order should be corrected to limit it to the legal maximum for a first degree misdemeanor, which is one year. See § 775.082(4), Fla. Stat. (2001). Affirmed; remanded for corr…
-
R.T. v. State, 879 So. 2d 1257 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)…the offense of burglary, after which the trial court withheld adjudication. We conclude that the evidence was legally sufficient. See Diaz v. State, 845 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Lopez v. State, 811 So. 2d 839 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); C.C. v. State, 823 So. 2d 263 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); State v. Dawson, 681 So. 2d 1206, 1207 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); see also § 810.07(1), Fla. Stat. (2003). Affirmed.…
Authorities Cited
- Alwin J. Jacobs v. State, 800 So. 2d 322 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)