RUDOLPH LOVE, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Love v. State, 886 So. 2d 276 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)
  …nced that it was sentencing defendant as an habitual felony offender and that there were no written reasons given for imposing a guideline departure sentence. The circuit court denied the motion and this Court per curiam affirmed. See Love v. State, 824 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). In this, his third bite at the apple, the defendant again claims that his habitual offender sentence is illegal. He argues this time that a prior conviction in Case No. 95-19638, which was within five years of his current offen…
• Ellis v. State, 935 So. 2d 29 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)
  …he still could not read the date, he stopped Palmer due to the “possibly expired” tag. We concluded that the stop was justified, but only up to the point that the deputy could read the expiration date on the tag. Id. at 680; see also Borys v. State, 824 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (upholding. a stop that was conducted because the officer was not able to read the expiration date on a temporary tag).2 [*33] In Palmer and Borys, we found the stops justified even though the officers had no reason to suspect tha…