THOMAS DOUGLAS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
THOMAS DOUGLAS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
824 So. 2d 256
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 11 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See § 812.13(1) and 3(b), Fla. Stat. (1997) (provides that robbery occurs if force or intimidation is used “prior to or contemporaneous' with, or subsequent to the taking of the property ....”) (emphasis added); see State v. Baker, 540 So. 2d 847, 848 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (legislature amended statute to repeal rule in Royal v. State, 490 So. 2d 44 (Fla.1986)).
GUNTHER, WARNER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Terrie G. Viets v. Am. Recruiters Enters., Inc., 922 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)…n to enter that sanction must be served on the offending party); see also Zeigler, 626 So. 2d at 1048 (motion to vacate default had to be granted where no notice of status conference, show cause hearing, or default); Adlington v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 824 So. 2d 256, 257 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (noting that when petitioner did not appear at case management conference, trial court issued order to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution). Here, the trial court correctly found that it h…
-
Young v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co., 80 So. 3d 1147 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)…n an explicit finding of willful noncompliance.’ ” Carpenter v. McCarty, 810 So. 2d 1053, 1054 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (quoting Commonwealth Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Tubero, 569 So. 2d 1271, 1273 (Fla.1990)); see also Adlington v. Florida Parole Com’n, 824 So. 2d 256, 257 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (citing Lenfestey v. U.S. Balloon Corp., 699 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)). The order granting dismissal with prejudice must include an explicit finding of willfulness, even when the lower court cites, with specificity, su…
-
Burke v. Snyder, 904 So. 2d 654 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)…pre-trial conference must contain explicit findings, supported by the record, that the party failing to attend the hearing did so in willful, intentional or deliberate disregard of the order setting the hearing. See Adlington v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 824 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), and cases cited therein. Here, the order only stated that the ease was dismissed because Burke did not appear at the hearing despite all parties having been noticed. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Royal v. State, 490 So. 2d 44 (Fla. 1986)
- Hodin v. Hodin, 540 So. 2d 847 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
- State v. Baker, 540 So. 2d 847 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)