JEREMY A. EDEN, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JEREMY A. EDEN, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
824 So. 2d 958
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Ashley v. State, 814 So. 2d 515 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Wright v. State, 711 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wilton Dedge v. State, 832 So. 2d 835 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)…It is also crucial that the movant strictly follow the substantive requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853. If this rule is not strictly complied with, the motion will be denied, as occurred in this case. See also Coombs v. State, 824 So. 2d 958 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Galloway v. State, 802 So. 2d 1173 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) Specifically, a Rule 3.853 motion must be under oath and must include the following: (1) a statement of the facts relied on, including a description of the physical evidence…
Authorities Cited
- Wright v. State, 711 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
- Waller v. Bennett H. Brummer, 814 So. 2d 515 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)