JUDITH ROSE, ET AL., ETC., PETITIONERS,
v.
NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINES LIMITED, ETC., RESPONDENT
JUDITH ROSE, ET AL., ETC., PETITIONERS,
NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINES LIMITED, ETC., RESPONDENT
825 So. 2d 342
Florida Supreme Court (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We originally accepted jurisdiction to review Norwegian Cruise Lines Ltd. v. Rose, 784 So. 2d 1248 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2001), pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), of the Florida Constitution. After further consideration, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted.
Accordingly, this case is hereby dismissed.
It is so ordered.
SHAW, HARDING, WELLS, and PARIENTE, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, C.J., and LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ„ dissent.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Carnival Corp. v. Gagliano, 907 So. 2d 647 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)…DCA Case no. 4D03-4824, opinion filed, June 22, 2005); Liggett Group Inc. v. Engle, 853 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), review granted, 873 So. 2d 1222 (Fla.2004); Norwegian Cruise Lines v. Rose, 784 So. 2d 1248 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), review dismissed, 825 So. 2d 342 (Fla.2002); Ulysses Cruises, Inc. v. Calves, 728 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). As to the other issues presented with respect to the dismissal below of entities allegedly responsible for the operation of the train, we affirm. See Helicopteros Naci…
Authorities Cited
- Norwegian Cruise Lines Ltd. v. Rose, 784 So. 2d 1248 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)