PENINSULAR NAVAL STORES COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
I. K. WATKINS AND C. B. HARRISON, APPELLEES
PENINSULAR NAVAL STORES COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
I. K. WATKINS AND C. B. HARRISON, APPELLEES
97 Fla. 805
Florida Supreme Court (1929)
Caution
Also reported at: 122 So. 107
Cited by 23 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the circuit court be and the same is hereby affirmed.
Terrell, C. j.. and Ellts and Brown, J. J. concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (13 total)
-
Dudley v. Harrison, 127 Fla. 687 (Fla. 1937)…voidance setting-up immaterial issues are: Hyer v. Vaugh, 18 Fla. 647; Jones v. Shomaker, 41 Fla. 232, 26 So. 191, and Peoples Nat. Bank v. Magruder, 77 Fla. 235, 81 So. 440. See also Gregory v. McNealy, 12 Fla. 578, and Edgar v. Bacon, 97 Fla. 679, 122 So. 107; Ruff v. G. S. & F. Railway Co., 67 Fla. 224, text 232, 64 So. 782, text 785.” Nor did the majority opinion in Pillet v. Ershick hold that Section 4615 C. G. L. had in fact changed the common law rule “that a motion for such a judgment cannot be in…1 / 2
-
Talley v. McCain, 128 Fla. 418 (Fla. 1937)…the court below. Furthermore, we might observe that a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto should always be made before the entry of judgment on the verdict as rendered. Dudley v. Harrison McCready Co., supra, and Edgar v. Bacon, 97 Fla. 679, 122 So. 107. See also 33 C.J. 1187. Reversed and remanded, with directions that the lower court entertain and dispose of the defendant’s motion for new trial. Ellis, C. J., and Terrell, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.…
-
Walker v. Smith, 119 Fla. 430 (Fla. 1935)…re out of place in an action at law. In such actions, the husband must be joined as co-plaintiff with the wife in all suits to enforce the personal and property rights of the wife, not as next friend, but as husband. See Edgar v. Bacon, 97 Fla. 679, 122 So. 107. My view is' that Section 4226 C. G. L. is a remedial statute and should be liberally construed, and that so con-' [*440] strued, the court below was in error in sustaining the demurrer to the third and fourth counts.…
Previewing 3 of 13 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence