S.M., A CHILD, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Lopez v. State, 832 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)
  …that the sentences are illegal. The defendant contends that the sentences imposed upon revocation of probation cannot exceed the original two-year probationary term. The defendant is incorrect. See § 948.06(1), Fla. Stat. (1999); Troncoso v. State, 825 So. 2d 494, 496 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). Each sentence imposed upon the defendant is within the legal maximum. The defendant also attempts to challenge the factual basis pursuant to which he was originally placed on probation in circuit court case number 99-6743.…
• Jenkins v. State, 269 So. 3d 584 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)
  …e be concurrent. We reject this argument as well. “The fact that the original terms of probation were ordered to run concurrently does not mandate that the sentences imposed after violation of probation also run concurrently.” Troncoso v. State, 825 So. 2d 494, 497 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); accord Ellis v. State, 406 So. 2d 76, 78 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). Finally, we reject Jenkins’s argument that his consecutive sentences violate double jeopardy. See § 921.16, Fla. Stat. (2005); State v. Cantrell, 417 So. 2d 26…
• Grayson v. State, 16 So. 3d 874 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009)
  …PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Troncoso v. State, 825 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Harris v. State, 771 So. 2d 565 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). PALMER, C.J., MONACO and COHEN, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

• L.O. v. State, 718 So. 2d 155 (Fla. 1998)