HENRY LEWIS ASTROP, APPELLANT,
v.
ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2002-09-03
No. 5D02-893
COBB, GRIFFIN and PALMER, JJ., concur.
825 So. 2d 494 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2002) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.315(a).

COBB, GRIFFIN and PALMER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Lopez v. State, 832 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)
    …that the sentences are illegal. The defendant contends that the sentences imposed upon revocation of probation cannot exceed the original two-year probationary term. The defendant is incorrect. See § 948.06(1), Fla. Stat. (1999); Troncoso v. State, 825 So. 2d 494, 496 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). Each sentence imposed upon the defendant is within the legal maximum. The defendant also attempts to challenge the factual basis pursuant to which he was originally placed on probation in circuit court case number 99-6743.…
  • Jenkins v. State, 269 So. 3d 584 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)
  • Grayson v. State, 16 So. 3d 874 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009)
    …PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Troncoso v. State, 825 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Harris v. State, 771 So. 2d 565 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). PALMER, C.J., MONACO and COHEN, JJ., concur.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw