CHARLES G. PARENT, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2002-09-11
No. 4D02-2270
STONE, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.
825 So. 2d 514 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2002) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying appellant’s motion for correction of sentence for jail time credit. Our decision, however, is without prejudice to appellant’s right to file a facially sufficient motion for jail cred it alleging where in the court record the information can be located (i.e., which jail records) and explaining how the record demonstrates entitlement to the relief requested (i.e., how appellant is entitled to sixty-eight additional days of jail credit.).

STONE, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Bentley v. State, 884 So. 2d 302 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)
    …PER CURIAM. Bentley appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.800(a) motion which sought additional jail credit. Bentley’s motion is facially insufficient because it does not explain why or how he is entitled to additional credit. Parent v. State, 825 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). We affirm without prejudice to file a facially sufficient motion. STONE, WARNER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.…
  • Sutton v. State, 889 So. 2d 927 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed without prejudice for appellant to file a facially sufficient motion for additional jail credit. Parent v. State, 825 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Gilbert v. State, 805 So. 2d 70 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). WARNER, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw