THOMAS WARREN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2002-08-07
No. 4D02-212
STONE, WARNER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
825 So. 2d 999 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2002) Caution
Cited by 9 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion for postconviction relief. Appellant contends that his counsel was ineffective in failing to investigate the case, failing to move to suppress evidence seized in a search, and failing to take depositions or prepare for trial. He attaches a letter from counsel indicating that appellant’s father retained counsel for the sole purpose of negotiating a plea. Therefore, the record suggests that counsel failed to investigate the case. However, he has not shown how counsel’s various failures would have resulted in the prejudice required under the analysis of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 686-87, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

We commend the trial court for its thorough analysis of each of the issues in this case, which has facilitated our review.

Affirmed.

STONE, WARNER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Stark v. State Farm Fla. Ins. Co., 95 So. 3d 285 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)
    …75 So. 2d 1216, 1218 (Fla.1985). Thus the notice condition in an insurance policy “can be avoided by a party alleging and showing that the insurance carrier was not prejudiced by noncompliance.” Id. See also Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Beville, 825 So. 2d 999, 1004 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (“Unless the carrier was prejudiced by the insured’s violation of the notice provision, the carrier could not avoid its duty to provide coverage for the expenses.”). Clearly, the burden is “on the insured to show lack of pr…
  • Aguero v. First Am. Ins. Co., 927 So. 2d 894 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
    …77 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). In response, Ryder claims that First American violated its duty because its unilateral defense under a reservation of rights was similar to a refusal to provide any defense at all. See Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Beville, 825 So. 2d 999, 1003 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). Ryder also claims that, because First American breached its duty, First American transferred to Ryder the power to defend itself against Iglesias’ claim. See Beville, 825 So. 2d at 1003. This issue was addressed in Travel…
  • …rer unjustifiably refuses to defend its insured, the insurer is liable to the insured for the reasonable attorney’s fees and other expenses incurred in defending the action brought by the third party.... ”); Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Beville, 825 So. 2d 999, 1003 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)(ex-plaining that when an insurer either refuses to defend or makes a reservation of rights, it violates its duty to unconditionally defend its insured and thereby transfers to the insured the power to defend). Liberty deni…

Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw