KINSER LYDELL BROWN, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• K.E. v. Dep't OF Juv. Just., 963 So. 2d 864 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)
  …detention issues after the expiration of the order at issue because they are “capable of repetition yet evading review.” See K.P. v. State, 952 So. 2d 1229 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007); T.T. v. Esteves, 828 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); W.B.T. v. Esteves, 825 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); T.C. v. Layne, 725 So. 2d 1278 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Juvenile detention is a remedy that is used only for a brief period of time. Furthermore, the subsequent home detention order merely changed the form of the restraint. It did…
• J.D. v. State, 954 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)
  …ded that the trial court was not permitted to stack secure detention periods for two or more offenses, and that habeas relief was appropriate because the adjudicatory hearing was not commenced within the 21 day limit. Finally, in W.B.T. v. Esteves, 825 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), the Fourth District construing the same statute also opined that the detention statute would not authorize a court to stack twenty-one day detention periods consecutively. More particularly, the court said that, “a court cannot,…
• M.P. v. State, 988 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008)
  …these violations, which occurred at different times and were the subject of different evidentiary hearings, to be treated as a single violation as the majority seems to contend. Indeed, this court in J.D. cited to the decision in W.B.T. v. Esteves, 825 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), and quoted from that decision as follows: “ ‘[A] court cannot, at one detention hearing, order secure detention for consecutive twenty-one day periods even though there are multiple delinquent acts charged.’ ” J.D., 954 So. 2d a…

Authorities Cited

• Shingledecker v. State, 734 So. 2d 483 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)