D.T.N., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
D.T.N., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
826 So. 2d 365
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Pendarvis v. State, 752 So. 2d 75, 76 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (holding that “[a] pretrial motion to suppress is not preserved for appellate review unless the defendant makes a specific contemporaneous objection at the time the evidence is admitted.”)
ALTENBE RND, NORTHCUTT, and KELLY, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Smith Dessin v. State, 868 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)…rial motion to suppress is not preserved for appellate review unless the defendant makes a specific, contemporaneous objection at the time the evidence is admitted.” Pendarvis v. State, 752 So. 2d 75, 76 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); see also D.T.N. v. State, 826 So. 2d 365, 366 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). Therefore, if trial counsel did not object at trial to the admission of the evidence that was the subject of the motion to suppress, that issue was not properly preserved for review, and counsel’s performance was deficient.…
Authorities Cited
- Best Union, Inc. v. Crespo, 752 So. 2d 75 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)
- Pendarvis v. State, 752 So. 2d 75 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)