DAVID EUGENE MILLER, PETITIONER,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• Solmo v. Friedman, 909 So. 2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)
  …cation was improper. “Whether relief should be granted pursuant to Rule 1.540 is a fact specific question and the trial court’s ruling should not be disturbed on appeal absent a gross abuse of discretion.” LPP Mortgage Ltd. v. Bank of America, N.A., 826 So. 2d 462, 463-64 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). Moreover, even if service were defective, Solmo clearly waived the right to challenge the court’s personal jurisdiction by participating pro se, without objection, in two hearings prior to the supplement to the final jud…
• In re Guardianship OF Theresa Marie Schiavo v. Schiavo, 851 So. 2d 182 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
  …ons grounded on general “inequity” of final judgment’s prospective application). Indeed, some cases suggest that an appellate court cannot reverse such an order absent a showing of a gross abuse of discretion. LPP Mortgage Ltd. v. Bank of Am., N.A., 826 So. 2d 462, 463-64 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Tilden Groves Holding Corp. v. Orlando/ Orange County Expressway, 816 So. 2d 658 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); see also Emmer v. Brucato, 813 So. 2d 264, 265 n. 1 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (expressing confusion as to difference between…
• Moralinda Rachid v. Omaira Torres Perez, 26 So. 3d 70 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)
  …cted to the order denying her motion for rehearing and a denial of her motion to set aside the order granting the motion to enforce the mediated settlement, the standard of review is gross abuse of discretion. LPP Mortgage Ltd. v. Bank of Am., N.A., 826 So. 2d 462, 463-64 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (holding that whether relief should be granted ... is a fact specific question and the trial courts ruling should not be dis [*72] turbed on appeal absent a gross abuse of discretion). We additionally note that [t]here is…