KENNETH A. JONES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A defendant whose plea was based on unconstitutional guidelines may seek to withdraw it if the plea would not have been entered had the defendant known the correct scoresheet total.
Kenneth Jones moved to withdraw his plea, arguing it was involuntary because it was based on unconstitutional 1995 sentencing guidelines. The trial co…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Involuntary Plea cases and more on FLexlaw
[*1105] NORTHCUTT, Judge.
Kenneth Jones filed a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 claiming his plea in two circuit court cases, CF97-001993 and CF96-05814, was involuntary and seeking to withdraw it. The circuit court denied his motion without conducting an evidentiary hearing. We reverse.
Jones entered into a plea agreement to resolve a violation of probation in the 1996 ease and new law violations in the 1997 case. The agreement called for a sentence at the bottom of the 1995 guidelines range, which the court imposed at his sentencing hearing. But the 1995 guidelines were later declared unconstitutional, Heggs v. State, 759 So. 2d 620 (Fla.2000), and Jones’s crimes were committed within the window period for challenging those guidelines, Trapp v. State, 760 So. 2d 924 (Fla.2000).
In this district, a defendant who entered into a plea agreement for a sentence based on the unconstitutional 1995 guidelines may seek to withdraw his plea by a rule 3.850 motion if he claims he would not have pleaded guilty or nolo contendere had he known what his correct scoresheet total would have been. Murphy v. State, 773 So. 2d 1174, 1175 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (en banc); Kleppinger v. State, 760 So. 2d 1045, 1046 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). The State correctly concedes that the circuit court should have conducted an evidentiary hearing on Jones’s motion. We reverse and remand for such a hearing. The court must determine, under Kleppinger and Murphy, whether Jones’s plea was voluntary. If the court finds it was not, the State will have the option of accepting a sentence at the low end of the 1994 guidelines or bringing Jones to trial on the original charges. See Rambo v. State, 816 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Hoag v. State, 801 So. 2d 207 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).
Reversed and remanded.
FULMER and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Heggs v. State, 759 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 2000)
- Xzavier Trapp v. State, 760 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 2000)
- Pagliaro v. Penske Auto Ctrs., Inc., 773 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)
- Jireh Kleppinger v. State, 760 So. 2d 1045 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)
- Manning v. State, 801 So. 2d 207 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)
- Hoag v. State, 801 So. 2d 207 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)
- Rambo v. State, 816 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)