THE CLEMENTS AGENCY AND AUGUSTUS K. CLEMENTS, III, APPELLANTS,
v.
GREGORY F. LUNGSTRUM, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the trial court's refusal to set aside a default judgment and dismiss the complaint, but reversed and remanded the denial of a motion to amend the final judgment to correct the misnamed defendant from an individual to the business entity.
A trial court abuses its discretion by refusing to amend a final judgment to correct a misnamed or misdescribed defendant when both parties request the correction.
[1] A trial court abuses its discretion under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 1.540(a) by refusing to amend a final judgment to correct a misnamed or misdescribed defenda…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe trial court entered a final judgment against "Defendant Augustus K. Clements, III d/b/a The Clements Agency" even though Mr. Clements was never a …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Amendment Of Judgment cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The Clements Agency and Augustus K. Clements, III, appeal the final judgment entered against them. We find no merit to the issues raised regarding the trial court’s refusal to set aside the default judgment and to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, and affirm as to these issues without further discussion. We, however, find merit to appellants’ argument that the trial court abused its discretion by denying appellee’s motion to amend the final judgment pursuant to rule 1.540(a).
The trial court entered a Final Judgment against “Defendant Augustus K. Clements, III d/b/a The Clements Agency” when it is clear from the record that Mr. Clements was never a named defendant or otherwise involved in the proceedings. Both appellants and appellee requested the trial court to amend the final judgment to remove the misnamed or misdescribed defendant, “Defendant Augustus K. Clements, III d/b/a The Clements Agency,” and correctly name the only remaining defendant, “The Clements Agency.” We find that the trial court’s denial of the parties’ request constitutes an abuse of discretion under these circumstances. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order of denial and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.
ERVIN, BOOTH and DAVIS, JJ., concur.