JAMES H. BELL, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Fortune v. Fortune, 61 So. 3d 441 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)
  …462, 463 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Byers v. Byers, 910 So. 2d 336, 344-45 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). Moreover, a total loan obligation should not be classified as a marital debt if part of the debt is used to pay for nonmarital expenses. See Walker v. Walker, 827 So. 2d 363, 364-65 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (holding that it would be improper for the trial court to classify as marital debt portions of a loan that were used to pay for nonmarital property expenses; reversing and remanding for trial court to “reevaluate whether a…
• Kasm v. Kasm, 933 So. 2d 48 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)
  …n making temporary fee determinations which, by their very nature, can be adjusted at a later date by an additional interim award or, in certain circumstances, a credit. See Nault v. Nault, 883 So. 2d 894 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (citing Walker v. Walker, 827 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), and Wrona v. Wrona, 592 So. 2d 694 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)). Nonetheless, in this case we are compelled to reach this result. See Safford v. Safford, 656 So. 2d 485, 486 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).…
• Krift v. Obenour, 152 So. 3d 645 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)
  …Fortune, 61 So. 3d 441, 445 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (reversing because the trial court classified the entire amount of a loan as a marital debt without making a finding as to when the debt was incurred or what the debt was used to pay); Walker v. Walker, 827 So. 2d 363, 364-65 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (reversing because the trial court classified the entire amount of a debt as a marital debt without determining which portion of the debt was used to pay the husband’s litigation and living expenses versus paying his perso…

Authorities Cited

• King v. State, 763 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)