ELISARMES HARRIS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ELISARMES HARRIS, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
827 So. 2d 382
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Elisarmes Harris appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence. Assuming, without deciding, that the motion of defendant-appellant Harris is cognizable under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), the record conclusively refutes it. The plea colloquy on page 6 specifically states, ‘You are now sentenced as a habitual offender.” As to defendant’s claim that he does not qualify as a habitual offender, the qualifying offenses were specifically read into the record of the same plea colloquy.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Beauford White v. State, 937 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)…r pro se pleadings from defendant relating to said case. So ordered. . Defendant also uses the monikers "Beau-ford Hawkins”, "Beulford Hawkins", and "Beulford White”. . See White v. State, 860 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)(table); White v. Moore, 827 So. 2d 382, 383 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); White v. State, 783 So. 2d 267, 2001 WL 335882 (Fla. 3d DCA Feb. 21, 2001)(table); White v. Moore, 751 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)(table); White v. State, 743 So. 2d 525 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)(table); White v. State, 693 So. 2…
-
Mestres v. State, 962 So. 2d 984 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)…[*985] PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Harris v. State, 827 So. 2d 382 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).…