ROSA CASAS, JORGE LUIS CASAS, AND LUIS CASAS, APPELLANTS/CROSS-APPELLEES,
v.
JOSE R. MARCOS, ANDRES CARRERA AND CAST MAR, INC., APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiffs, Rosa Casas, Jorge Luis Casas, and Luis Casas, appeal from a final judgment, and the defendants, Jose R. Marcos, Andres Carrera, and Cast Mar, Inc., cross-appeal from an adverse final judgment awarding attorney’s fees and costs. We affirm, in part, and reverse, in part.
The plaintiffs and defendants have raised multiple issues on appeal. We find that none merit discussion, and therefore, we affirm. However, the defendants have properly conceded that the trial court erred in calculating the collateral source set-off as to Jorge Luis Casas, and that the final judgment as to Jorge should reflect an award of $4,692.36. See § 627.7372, Fla. Stat. (1991). Therefore, we affirm, in part, and reverse, in part.
Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Hodges, 151 So. 3d 531 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)…A 1993). Sentence manipulation The trial court’s written order contained an additional basis for downward depar [*536] ture not stated orally at the time of sentencing: that the police engaged in sentence manipulation, citing to State v. Steadman, 827 So. 2d 1022 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). We conclude this reason was improperly included in the written order and was not supported by competent substantial evidence. First, the issue of sentence manipulation was never raised at the time of the plea and sentence. Neith…1 / 2
-
State v. Simmons, 80 So. 3d 1089 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)…justify the trial court’s departure sentence based upon the notion that “there would be no crime here, if [the] police did not create the situation.” In support of his argument, Simmons relies upon the Third District’s opinion in State v. Steadman, 827 So. 2d 1022 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). In Steadman, police officers bought cocaine from a defendant within 1000 feet of a school as part of a sting operation. Id. at 1024. They continued to purchase cocaine from the defendant on various occasions, delaying defendant’s…
-
State v. Johnson, 224 So. 3d 877 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)…cocaine and two counts of sale of cannabis in violation of sections 893.13(l)(a)(l), and (l)(a)(2), Florida Statutes (2014), the trial court imposed concurrent downward departure sentences of ten months’ jail on each count. Citing State v. Steadman, 827 So. 2d 1022 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), the court based the departure on its finding that law enforcement officers engaged in sentence manipulation by making multiple purchases over the course of their sting operation for no’ reason other than to increase Johnson’s pot…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence