AUSTRAL LINEAS AEREAS CIELOS DEL SUR, ETC., APPELLANT,
v.
RAQUEL LAURA GIMENEZ, ETC., APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2002-10-16
No. 3D01-1334
Before JORGENSON, COPE, and GODERICH, JJ.
827 So. 2d 1113 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order denying the appellant’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. As we have already determined that the proper forum for this case is Argentina, see Aerolineas Argentinas, S.A. v. Gimenez, 807 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), cert. denied, No. 02-461, 828 So. 2d 386 (Fla. Sept. 23, 2002), the law of the case doctrine renders this issue moot. See Lawson v. Latham, 564 So. 2d 1216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (“[Q]uestions of law which have been decided by the highest appellate court become the law of the case which, except in extraordinary circumstances, must be followed in subsequent proceedings, both in the lower and the appellate courts.”) (citing Brunner Enter., Inc., v. Dept. of Revenue, 452 So. 2d 550, 552 (Fla.1984)).

REVERSED.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Picked v. State, 32 So. 3d 638 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)
    …orida cases. See, e.g., Owen v. State, 986 So. 2d 534, 549 (Fla.2008); Kelley v. State, 974 So. 2d 1047, 1050 (Fla.2007); Douglas v. State, 878 So. 2d 1246, 1252 n. 4 (Fla.2004); Armstrong v. State, 862 So. 2d 705, 712 (Fla. 2003); Yisrael v. State, 827 So. 2d 1113, 1114 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Arnold v. State, 807 So. 2d 136, 139 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Johnson v. State, 717 So. 2d 1057, 1061 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).…
  • WMS Constr., Inc. v. N. Am. Specialty Ins. Co., 929 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
    …bond governed by the requirements of section 713.245. This determination is the law of the case and governs the case through all stages of the proceedings. Greene v. Massey, 384 So. 2d 24 (Fla.1980); Austral Lineas Aereas Cielos Del Sur v. Gimenez, 827 So. 2d 1113 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). Therefore, the issue of the nature of the bond in this case is moot. Accordingly, we affirm the Order granting Final Summary Judgment in favor of NAS. Affirmed. . That statute reads in relevant part: 713.245. Conditional paym…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw