MIGUEL E. LANGEBECK, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MIGUEL E. LANGEBECK, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
828 So. 2d 436
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Prieto v. State, 824 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Bellevue v. State, 794 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Saldana v. State, 786 So. 2d 643 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), case dismissed, 804 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 2001).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Adams v. Narkiewicz, 834 So. 2d 257 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)…e December 28, 1998 order. Thus, Adams’ motion was actually a motion for rehearing and her appeal is untimely pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b). Her time to appeal this issue expired January 27, 1999. See Bertrand v. Bertrand, 828 So. 2d 436 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), (citing Perkins v. Salem, 249 So. 2d 466 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971). Since Adam’s Motion to Set Aside Child Support is also duplicative of her motion of November 30, 1998, the trial court properly struck the motion as repetitive. See Ve…
Authorities Cited
- Prieto v. State, 824 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)
- Saldana v. State, 786 So. 2d 643 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)
- McKenzie Bellevue v. State, 794 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)