CHARLES FRANK WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CHARLES FRANK WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
828 So. 2d 443
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
BLUE, Chief Judge.
Charles Frank Williams appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. Although laches, the trial court’s stated reason for denial, is improper without an evidentiary hearing, see Omasta v. State, 805 So. 2d 846 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001), we have examined the record and have determined that all of Mr. Williams’ claims are untimely. See Wood v. State, 750 So. 2d 592 (Fla.1999); Major v. State, 814 So. 2d 424 (Fla.2002).
Affirmed.
ALTENBERND and CASANUEVA, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wilson v. State, 868 So. 2d 654 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)…ine of laches may bar relief, we note that “Application of the doctrine often involves factual issues that are not properly resolved without an evidentiary hearing.” Love v. State, 814 So. 2d 475, 478 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); see also Williams v. State, 828 So. 2d 443 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. FULMER and STRINGER, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Wood v. State, 750 So. 2d 592 (Fla. 1999)
- Daron Merritt v. State, 814 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 2002)
- Omasta v. State, 805 So. 2d 846 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)