ANTHONY DELOPA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ANTHONY DELOPA, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
828 So. 2d 1091
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2002)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed. See Mims-Smith v. Single-tary, 719 So. 2d 377 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).
BROWNING, LEWIS and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Brookwood Extended Care Ctr. OF Homestead, LLP v. Agency for Healthcare Admin., 870 So. 2d 834 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)…te the facts as the petitioner "perceives them to be.” . It should be noted that neither party to this appeal has suggested that this proceeding is governed by any rule other than 28-106.201. . Brookwood's reliance on Scott v. Department of State, 828 So. 2d 1091(Fla. 2d DCA 2002), to support its contention that it substantially complied with applicable administrative rules is misplaced. Scott involved the revocation of a license governed by Rule 28-107.004 which provides for administrative review of orders…
Authorities Cited
- Walker v. Allstate Ins. Co., 719 So. 2d 377 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)