HARDY JAMES, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Prison Releasee Reoffender Sentencing cases and more on FLexlaw
KELLY, Judge.
In this appeal brought pursuant to An-ders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we find no error in Hardy James, Jr.’s convictions for carjacking, robbery by sudden snatching, attempted robbery, and aggravated fleeing and eluding. Accordingly, we affirm James’ convictions. We also find no error in James’ sentences. James asserts that the trial court improperly sentenced him to equal concurrent sentences as a habitual felony offender and prison releasee reof-fender on the carjacking count. While the State does not challenge this assertion, our review of the record indicates that James received a thirty-year minimum mandatory sentence as a prison releasee reoffender, but he was not also sentenced as a habitual offender on that count.
Affirmed.
NORTHCUTT and COVINGTON, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hardy James, Jr. v. State, 17 So. 3d 753 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)…rect appeal, this court affirmed on the ground that “the record indicates that James received a thirty-year minimum mandatory sentence as a prison releasee reoffender, but he was not also sentenced as a habitual offender” on count 1. James v. State, 829 So. 2d 271, 271 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). James then raised this issue of discrepancy between the oral pronouncement and the written sentence in a prior 3.800(a) motion. The postconviction court found in its September 2007 order that there was no habitual offender…
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)