JIMMY JAMES WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JIMMY JAMES WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
829 So. 2d 275
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.140(g), (o); Young v. State, 632 So. 2d 245, 246 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Williams v. Williams, 904 So. 2d 488 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)…3d DCA 1998) (“As is often the case in divorce, income that was once used to maintain one household must now be used to maintain two. If this means that both parties must reduce their standard of living, so be it.”); see also Rashotsky v. Rashotsky, 829 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Austin v. Austin, 785 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 800 So. 2d 612 (Fla.2001). The former wife contends that the trial court abused its discretion by denying her request for permanent periodic alimony and by awarding…
-
Rashotsky v. Rashotsky, 881 So. 2d 556 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)…f $7610. The former husband again appealed. This Court reversed and remanded again, finding the trial court’s refusal to reconsider evidence as to the parties needs and ability to pay, “thwarted” this Court’s prior directive. Rashotsky v. Rashotsky, 829 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). [*557] Two evidentiary hearings were conducted on remand. Both, parties stipulated that 1999 was the relevant year for determining need and ability to pay, and presented evidence as to expenses and income. The former husband test…
Authorities Cited
- Fallada v. State, 632 So. 2d 245 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)