B. H. WILCOX, INDIVIDUALLY, AND B. H. WILCPX, SUING FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF BANK OF POMPANO, APPELLANTS,
v.
CHARLIE JACOBS, MAX KLEIN, JACOB J. SCHNEIDER AND MAX SCHNEIDER, APPELLEES

Fla. | 1929-07-18
Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.
98 Fla. 183 Florida Supreme Court (1929) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • House v. State, 127 Fla. 145 (Fla. 1937)
    …atters not duly disposed'of, included the incomplete [*149] judgment and sentence. The remaining order in the habeas corpus proceeding caused the petitioner to be taken before the trial court for a proper judgment and sentence. See Wilcox v. Jacobs, 98 Fla. 183, 123 So. 573; Anderson v. Chapman, 109 Fla. 54, 146 So. 675; Ellis v. State, 100 Fla. 27, 129 So. 106. When in a criminal prosecution the court, upon a verdict of guilty or upon a plea of guilty, imposes a sentence of imprisonment upon the defendan…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw