J. PATRICK SWETT, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 2002-10-10
No. SC01-1
ANSTEAD, C.J., SHAW, WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., and HARDING, Senior Justice, concur.
829 So. 2d 901 Florida Supreme Court (2002) Negative Treatment
Cited by 254 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of the decision in State v. Swett, 772 So. 2d 48 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), based on alleged express and direct conflict with Frazier v. State, 766 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), and Daniels v. State, 568 So. 2d 63 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss this case.

It is so ordered.

ANSTEAD, C.J., SHAW, WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., and HARDING, Senior Justice, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (244 total)

  • McLEAN v. State, 934 So. 2d 1248 (Fla. 2006)
    …ar facts legally relevant to show identity.” Id. “[Substantial similarity” is also required “when the [collateral crime] evidence is sought to be admitted for the specific purpose of establishing absence of mistake or accident.” Robertson v. State, 829 So. 2d 901, 909 (Fla.2002). We have also explained that “[a]lthough similarity is not a requirement for admission of other crime evidence, when the fact to be proven is, for example, identity or common plan or scheme it is generally the similarity between the…
  • Wallace v. Dean, 3 So. 3d 1035 (Fla. 2009)
    …(Fla.2006) (identifying misapplication of our precedent as one means of supplying conflict jurisdiction); Aguilera v. Inservs., Inc., 905 So. 2d 84, 86 (Fla.2005) (same); Knowles v. State, 848 So. 2d 1055, 1056 (Fla.2003) (same); Robertson v. State, 829 So. 2d 901, 904 (Fla.2002) (same); Vest v. Travelers Ins. Co., 753 So. 2d 1270, 1272 (Fla.2000) (same); State v. Stacey, 482 So. 2d 1350, 1350 (Fla.1985) (same); Arab Termite & Pest Control of Fla., Inc., 409 So. 2d 1039, 1040 (Fla.1982) (same). . Kaisner v.…
  • Butler v. Yusem, 44 So. 3d 102 (Fla. 2010)
    …of Appeal in Yusem v. Butler (Butler III), 10 So. 3d 1159 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009), on the ground that it expressly and directly conflicts with our decision in Butler v. Yusem (Butler II), 3 So. 3d 1185 (Fla.2009), and our decision in Robertson v. State, 829 So. 2d 901 (Fla.2002), regarding the proper application of the tipsy coachman doctrine. We also conclude that the decision of the Fourth District, which holds that failure to establish justifiable reliance is a bar to recovery based on fraudulent misrepresenta…

Previewing 3 of 244 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw