E.G., FATHER OF J.G. AND K.B., CHILDREN, APPELLANT,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• B.C. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 864 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)
  …he scrivener’s error should be corrected to reflect the agreement of the parties and the court’s oral pronouncement. To the extent that the order needs clarification, we remand the matter to the trial court. See Y.G. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 830 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). Of more significance, B.C. argues that section 39.01(14)(a) was not intended to allow children to be found dependent when the allegations are against only one parent and there exists another fit non-offending parent willing to…
• P.M. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 865 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)
  …nowledge the findings of abuse by the father set forth in the order do not comport with Judge Mize’s oral pronouncement from the adjudicatory hearing. Ordinarily we would remand for a corrected order. See Y.G. v. Department of Children and Families, 830 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (remand was necessary to correct dependency order so that it conformed with oral pronouncement that basis for dependency was prospective neglect, not abuse as stated in the order): However, we decline to do so because of the ser…
• Earl v. Earl, 174 So. 3d 435 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)
  …and agrees that the final judgment failed to include this requirement. We therefore reverse and remand to allow the trial court to include the former husband’s requirement to maintain $100,000 in life insurance. Y.G. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 830 So. 2d 212, 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (“The written findings must be amended to conform with the oral pronouncement.”). We affirm on the alimony issue. Reversed and Remanded. KLINGENSMITH, J., and ROBY, WILLIAM L., Associate Judge, concur.…