PAMELA LOUISE ROYALL, APPELLANT,
v.
HARDIN JOSEPH ROYALL, JR., APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Equitable Distribution cases and more on FLexlaw
HARRIS, J.
There is much to be said for the wife’s extraordinary contributions to the family’s financial needs over the final years of this marriage. Her claim of being “shortchanged” in the divorce is therefore not surprising. But these issues raised in this appeal must be determined on whether there is competent evidence to support the trial judge’s decision. Because we find that there is, we affirm.
The parties agree that in calculating equitable distribution the trial court used (apparently due to a scrivener’s error) the incorrect figure of $135,000 instead of the correct figure of $133,855 as the non-marital value of Royall Construction of Central Florida, Inc. On remand the trial court should correct this error and accordingly revise the equitable distribution numbers.
We find no merit to any other issues.
AFFIRMED AND REMANDED FOR CORRECTION.
GRIFFIN and ORFINGER, R.B., JJ, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Biscayne Park, LLC v. Wal-Mart Stores E., LP, 34 So. 3d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)…reover, because the wells on Biscayne’s property were destroyed following the entry of an improper injunction, on remand Biscayne can proceed against Wal-Mart’s posted bond on its claim for damages. See Jefferies & Co. v. Int’l Assets Holding Corp., 830 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Shea v. Cent. Diagnostic Servs., Inc., 552 So. 2d 344 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). Reversed and remanded. . We do not address the remaining points raised on appeal. . This Court notes that the issuance of the "temporary” injunction w…
-
Daiwa Prods., Inc. v. Nationsbank, N.A., 885 So. 2d 884 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)…ction. E.g., § 60.07, Fla. Stat. (1999) (providing that on dissolution of an injunction, “the court may hear evidence and assess damages to which a defendant may be entitled under any injunction bond”); Jefferies & Co. v. Int’l Assets Holding Corp., 830 So. 2d 256, 259 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). “The standard for determining whether an injunction was wrongfully issued is simply whether the petitioning party was unentitled to injunc-tive relief.” Parker Tampa Two, Inc. v. Somerset Dev. Corp., 544 So. 2d 1018, 1021-2…
-
Kailin HU v. Haitian HU, 942 So. 2d 992 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)…harm such as a breach of an enforceable restrictive covenant or a misappropriation of trade secrets or customer lists. Therefore, the trial court’s ex parte injunction order must be stricken. See Jefferies & Co., Inc., v. Int’l Assets Holding Corp., 830 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)(holding that trial court erred in granting ex parte temporary injunction prohibiting marketing activities of defendant company because there had been no showing that plaintiff company would likely suffer irreparable harm or lacke…