ALVIN LEWIS, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, ETC., APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The appellate court reversed the dismissal of a petition for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief, finding that the trial court failed to provide the appellant with proper notice and an opportunity to show good cause for continued prosecution.
Yes, the trial court erred by dismissing the petition without affording the appellant the required notice and opportunity to demonstrate good cause for the action to remain pending.
[1] An action may be dismissed for failure to prosecute if no record activity has occurred for one year preceding the motion, provided reasonable notice is given to the parti…
[2] Following a showing of one year of no record activity, a plaintiff must be given an opportunity to establish good cause why the action should not be dismissed.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“First, the defendant is required to show there has been no record activity for the year preceding the motion. Second, if there has been no record activity, the plaintiff has an opportunity to establish good cause why the action should not be dismissed.”
This quote explains the two-step process required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e) for dismissing an action for failure to prosecute.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe appellant's petition was dismissed for failure to prosecute after a year of no record activity. The trial court dismissed the action without notic…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Notice Of Dismissal cases and more on FLexlaw
Alvin Lewis appeals the dismissal of his petition for Declaratory Judgment and In-junctive Relief for failure to prosecute. With several motions pending, the trial court had observed no record activity by the appellant in over one year and dismissed the claim. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e), provides:
Failure to Prosecute. All actions in which it appears on the face of the record that no activity by filing of pleadings, order of court, or otherwise has occurred for a period of 1 year shall be dismissed by the court on its own motion or on the motion of any interested person, whether a party to the action or not, after reasonable notice to the parties, unless a stipulation staying the action is approved by the court or a stay order has been filed or a party shows good cause in writing at least 5 days before the hearing on the motion why the action should remain pending. Mere inaction for a period of less than 1 year shall not be sufficient cause for dismissal for failure to prosecute.
Likewise, in Del Duca v. Anthony, 587 So. 2d 1306 (Fla.1991), the Supreme Court observed that the resolution of a motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute involves a two-step process. “First, the defendant is required to show there has been no record activity for the year preceding the motion. Second, if there has been no record activity, the plaintiff has an opportunity to establish good cause why the action should not be dismissed.” Del Duca, 587 So. 2d at 1308-09. In the instant case, it does not appear that Lewis had the opportunity to demonstrate good cause why his action should not be dismissed as required by the rule and controlling case law. The appel-lee admits that it never received notice of the dismissal, and it appears the same is true as to Lewis. Accordingly, the order under review is vacated and the matter is remanded for further proceedings. The trial judge should ensure those steps are taken which provide compliance with Rule 1.420(e) and Del Duca, and then make its ruling.
Reversed and remanded.