GUSTAVO BAUTISTA ORTIZ AND EDGAR SANCHEZ, APPELLANTS,
v.
IN RE FORFEITURE OF $341,675.00, ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 2002-11-20
No. 3D01-3466
Before JORGENSON, GODERICH, and GREEN, JJ.
830 So. 2d 277 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The respondents below appeal from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment on the City of Coral Gables Police Department’s petition for - forfeiture of funds seized for alleged money laundering. We affirm.

In a comprehensive and well-reasoned ten-page order; the trial court addressed each of the respondents’ arguments and referred to the testimony of the petitioners and their own expert. The court properly determined that there was an absence of a genuine issue of material fact and that the City of Coral Gables was' entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, the summary judgment is

AFFIRMED.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Bostic v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2019)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Bertonatti v. State, 251 So. 3d 237 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018); Stone v. State, 830 So. 2d 277 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw