C.S., APPELLANT,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Fla. E. Coast Ry., L.L.C. v. Jones, 847 So. 2d 1118 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)
  …y causing material harm — disclosure of privileged work-product — for which there is no adequate [*1119] remedy on final appeal. See Gardner v. Manor Care of Boca Raton, Inc., 831 So. 2d 676 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); 1620 Health Partners, L.C. v. Fluitt, 830 So. 2d 935 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). After the Railway objected to Jones’ request for photographs, measurements, and a diagram prepared by it after the accident, the respondent filed a motion to compel. No sworn testimony was taken at the hearing, nor did responde…
• Fla. EYE Clinic, P.A. v. Gmach, 14 So. 3d 1044 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009)
  …the attorney defending a licensed facility in litigation and are subject to discovery upon a showing of need and inability without undue hardship to obtain the substantial equivalent by other means.”); see also 1620 Health Partners, L.C. v. Fluitt, 830 So. 2d 935, 938 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). The trial court, nevertheless, concluded that amendment 7 superseded the work-product privilege because the documents disclosed in FEC’s privilege log “are of a character which meets the classification of ‘self-policing pro…
• Jacob v. Barton, 877 So. 2d 935 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)
  …ed. See Paskoski v. Johnson, 626 So. 2d 338, 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). The circuit court’s order requiring production was a departure from the essential requirements of law’ and cannot be remedied on appeal. See 1620 Health Partners, L.C. v. Fluitt, 830 So. 2d 935, 936 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Quarles & Brady, LLP v. Birdsall, 802 So. 2d 1205, 1206 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). We grant the petition for certiorari and quash the order permitting unlimited discovery of the trust’s attorneys’ billing records. We remand with d…

Authorities Cited

• Pitcher v. Schneider (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
• Albert v. Applegate et ux., 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)