DOUGLAS TUNSIL, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Shahla M. Rabie Cortez v. Palace Holdings, 66 So. 3d 959 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)
  …g witnesses to Florida for deposition or trial, and the trial court incorrectly summarily concluded in its order “witnesses from Mexico will need to be called to testify.” See Picketts, 576 A. 2d at 527; accord A.D.M. Prods., [*971] Inc. v. Solomon, 831 So. 2d 259, 260 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (“The trial court must evaluate the relevancy and materiality of the potential testimony that a listed witness may bring to the issues.”). Florida law also permits testimony at trial through videotaped or transcribed depositi…
• A.D.M. Prods., Inc. v. Solomon, 847 So. 2d 1139 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)
  …PER CURIAM. Pursuant to our previous mandate in A.D.M. Prods., Inc. v. Solomon, 831 So. 2d 259 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), the trial court conducted a Kinney1 hearing on the appellant’s motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens and denied the same. On this appeal, on the record before us, we cannot find that the denial of the motion was an abuse of…

Authorities Cited

• Tunsil v. State, 797 So. 2d 651 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)