MARK B. BAUM, APPELLANT,
v.
NORI ALYCE BAUM, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Notice Of Appeal Timing cases and more on FLexlaw
GRIFFIN, J.
Mark B. Baum [“husband”] appeals an order modifying a final judgment of dissolution. We are bound to affirm on issues I, II, IV and V because husband has failed to provide an adequate record for this court to review the actions by the trial court and make a determination of error. Applegate v. Barnett Bank, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla.1979). As for issue III, this court does not have jurisdiction to review an order entered after the filing of the notice of appeal. We elect not to sua sponte amend the notice of appeal for this subsequently entered order because our research reveals that the argument lacks merit. Ford v. Ford, 816 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Sealander v. Sealander, 789 So. 2d 401 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), Wallace v. Department of Revenue, 774 So. 2d 804 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).
AFFIRMED.
HARRIS and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Franks v. Franks, 848 So. 2d 420 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)…PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See, e.g., Baum v. Baum, 831 So. 2d 791 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). GRIFFIN, ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Pitcher v. Schneider (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
- Albert v. Applegate et ux., 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)
- Wallace v. Dep't OF Revenue, 774 So. 2d 804 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)
- Sealander v. Sealander, 789 So. 2d 401 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)
- Loraine Clark Ford v. Ford, 816 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)