TERRANCE GAINES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2002-12-10
No. 5D02-3413
SHARP, W., HARRIS and PALMER, JJ., concur.
831 So. 2d 799 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2002) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Bruno v. State, 807 So. 2d 55 (Fla.2001); Jones v. State, 591 So. 2d 911 (Fla.1991); Nelson v. State, 816 So. 2d 694 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).

SHARP, W., HARRIS and PALMER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Westerbeke Corp. v. Atherton, 224 So. 3d 816 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)
    …ariety of legal sources, including recent controlling case law, rules of court, statutes, and constitutional law” as well as “an interpretation or application of a statute, a procedural rule, or a constitutional provision”); cf. Richardson v. State, 831 So. 2d 799, 802 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (denying petition for writ of certiorari because “trial court did not err by considering pertinent federal cases to analyze the issues that were presented”). Neither Westerbeke nor the respondents cite to controlling law rega…
  • State v. Seitz, 973 So. 2d 663 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)
    …ctim of these crimes, Unruh undoubtedly will be “biased” in her own, and thus in the State’s, favor. Seitz has also failed to demonstrate any legitimate basis for inquiring into the State’s reasons for prosecuting this case. See Richardson v. State, 831 So. 2d 799, 801 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (confirming that Florida applies a “heightened burden of proof on defendants to prove a selective prosecution claim” and that “to establish a selective prosecution claim, a defendant [*665] must show that the prosecutorial po…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw